|
| United States Patent |
6,032,331 |
| Alonso |
March 7, 2000 |
Checking mechanisms with variable plane trigger plates
Abstract
An improved mechanism (22) for checking reciprocating operative devices
(10) to include door systems, by means of an improved rocker-washer
mechanism (22) adapted to pivot (24) and frictionally engage the device (10)
comprising at least one rod (16) that reciprocatively functions from within
a body (12) having a biasing operative means (11), that upon extension of
said rod (16) from said body (12), the bias 11-A and 11-B acting to control
the reciprocation of said rod (16); the mechanism (22) including a central
structure (34) forming an aperture configuration (26) which is mountable and
disposable axially (17) upon the surface of the rod (16), said aperture (26)
bounding two opposing loci (26-A) and (26-B) relationally composed upon a
common axis of symmetry (32) which is realized when mounted upon a
cross-section of the rod (16); each locus (26-A) and (26-B) comprising at
least one metallic point (28) for creating a substantial friction pressure
torsionally applied onto said rod (16) to engage said mechanism (22); the
opposing torsion pressure (29) comprised within an axial plane (30) of the
mechanism (22) upon said rod (16); said central structure (34) fixated to a
trigger plate appendage (38) means to form an angular joint (42) generally
of substantially 90 degrees or less at the origin, projectable upon a side
view of the rocker-washer mechanism (22) wherein said angle comprises one
axis (42-A) projecting upon the face of said central structure (34), and
comprises the other axis (42-B) projecting from said origin; said trigger
plate appendage (38) further comprising a variable trigger area (40) for
transposing said torsion (29), adapted to abut against said body (12) of the
device (10), said trigger plate appendage (38) composed as to define said
variable trigger area (40) disposable upon a substantial curvature surface,
wherein the area (40) permits the means for variable adjustment of said
mechanism (22) upon a variable plane (42-C) projected from the axis of
origin (40-B), and projected to said trigger area (40); whereby said
improvements comprise a superior mechanism (22) for frictionally checking
said device (10) upon engagement, thus providing the maximum torsional
pressure (29) within the axial plane (30) of said mechanism (22).
| Inventors: |
Alonso; Ricardo (111 S. Perry St.,
Denver, CO 80219) |
| Appl. No.: |
980381 |
| Filed: |
November 28, 1997 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
16/82; 16/49; 16/66
|
| Intern'l Class: |
E05F 005/02 |
| Field of Search: |
16/82,66,49,71,72,84,85,DIG.
17,DIG. 10 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
|
2732920 |
Jan., 1956 |
Newton. |
|
|
2920338 |
Jan., 1960 |
Falk. |
|
|
3032806 |
Jul., 1962 |
Mallory. |
|
|
3162889 |
Dec., 1964 |
Runnels. |
|
|
3566435 |
Mar., 1971 |
Nakamura. |
|
|
3665549 |
May., 1972 |
Quinn. |
|
|
4194264 |
Mar., 1980 |
Stoffregen. |
|
|
4777698 |
Oct., 1988 |
Lord. |
|
|
4815163 |
Mar., 1989 |
Simmons. |
|
| Foreign Patent Documents |
| 623038 |
Apr., 1961 |
CA. |
|
Primary Examiner: Mah; Chuck Y.
Parent Case Text
This is a division of Ser. No. 08/677,101, filed on Jul. 9, 1996 (07-09
-96), now abandoned.
Claims
I claim:
1. A method for checking reciprocative devices (10) including door closer
systems (10) comprising a rod (16) that functions reciprocatively from
within a body (12) having a biasing means (11), that, upon extension of said
rod (16) from within said body (12), said device (10) normally acting to
control the reciprocation of said rod (16); said checking is performed
frictionally by means of a checking mechanism (22) composed of a
predetermined, hardened and tempered sheet metal gauge (37) for mounting
axially (17) onto said rod (16), comprising an aperture configuration (26)
bounded within a central structure (34) disposing a fulcrum locus (26-A)
opposing a counter locus (26-B), both diametrically composed upon a common
axis of symmetry (32) and each providing at least one substantial opposing
friction point (28) for urging upon the surfaces (16-A) (16-B) of said rod
(16) a substantial direct frictional pressure (29) created within an axial
plane (30); said mechanism (22) further including at least one trigger
appendage (38) angularly attached to said central structure (34) to form a
fixated joint (42) projectable by projecting one axis (42-A) upon the face
of said central structure (34), and projecting the other axis (42-B) from
the origin of said fixated joint (42); said trigger appendage (38) disposing
a trigger point (40) to abut against said body (12) upon a trigger plane
(42-C) projected from the origin axis (42-B) and projected to the abutting
trigger point (40); wherein said common axis of symmetry (32) coincides upon
a diametric cross-section of said rod (16) engaged thereto, comprising the
steps of
applying a force (11-A) to cause the rod (16) to be at least partially
extended from within said body (12), thereby creating a reciprocative
counter-force (11-B);
leveraging said mechanism (22) to pivotally engage (24) said rod (16)
responsive to said trigger point (40) abutting said body (12), wherein said
trigger plane (42-C) comprises the means to substantially vary as the
abutting trigger point (40) also varies upon the surface of said trigger
appendage (38), and wherein the distance from said trigger point (40) to a
friction point (28) upon said fulcrum locus (26-A) comprises a substantially
greater distance than the distance between the opposing friction points (28)
within the loci (26-A) and (26-B);
torquing said surfaces (16-A) (16-B) of said rod (16) between said opposing
friction points (28) within the loci (26-A) and (26-B), to comprise a
cross-sectional distance created between the points (28) which is
substantially less than the cross-sectional diameter of said rod (16) upon
said common axis of symmetry (32);
urging said points (28) upon the rod surfaces (16-A) (16-B) wherein said
direct frictional pressure (29) within said axial plane (30) is not in
substantial linear alignment upon said common axis of symmetry (32);
resisting the movement of said biasing means (11) normally acting to control
the reciprocation of said rod (16), responsive to said direct frictional
pressure (29) urged between said opposing friction points (28).
2. The method for checking reciprocative devices (10) of claim 1, wherein
said step of leveraging said mechanism (22) is performed by said trigger
appendage (38) comprising a substantial curvature surface selected from the
group consisting of an substantial arching, ovoid, and convex design (40-A),
an installed pad or clip (40-B), and an adjustable screw means (40-C),
whereby said curvature surface is also projected from said origin axis
(42-B) and projected to the abutting trigger point (40).
3. The method for checking reciprocative devices (10) of claim 1, wherein
said fixated joint (42) angularly attaching said trigger appendage (38) onto
said central structure (34) comprising an angle at substantially 90 degrees
or less.
4. The method for checking reciprocative devices (10) of claim 3, wherein
said fixated joint (42) further comprising a strengthening means (43)
selected from the group consisting of tempering, hardening, and crimping.
5. The method for checking reciprocative devices (10) of claim 1 wherein
said loci (26-A) and (26-B) are composed upon separate and variable bodies
comprising said central structure (34), whereby varying the distance between
said opposing points (28) within said axial plane (30).
6. A checking mechanism (22) composed of a predetermined, tempered and
hardened metal gauge (37) for frictionally checking reciprocative devices
(10) including door closer systems (10) comprising a rod (16) that functions
reciprocatively from within a body (12) having a biasing means (11), that,
upon displacement of said rod (16) from within said body (12), said device
(10) normally acting to control the reciprocating of said rod (16); said
checking mechanism (22) axially (17) mountable onto said rod (16) wherein a
common axis of symmetry (32) coincides upon a diametric cross-section of
said rod (16) engaged thereto, comprising
an aperture configuration (26) bounded within a central structure (34)
disposing a fulcrum locus (26-A) opposing a counter locus (26-B), both
diametrically composed upon said common axis of symmetry (32) and each
providing at least one substantial opposing friction point (28) for urging
upon the surfaces (16-A) (16-B) of the rod (16) a substantial direct
frictional pressure (29) created within an axial plane (30);
a trigger appendage (38) for abutting against said body (12) disposing a
trigger point (40) upon a variable trigger plane (42-C) projecting from an
axis (42-B) originating an angular fixation of said trigger appendage (38)
onto said central structure (34), and projected to the abutting trigger
point (40), wherein said trigger plane (42-C) comprising the means to vary
substantially as said abutting trigger point (40) also varies upon the
surface of said trigger appendage (38);
said angular fixation comprising a fixated joint (42) to form an angle of
substantially 90 degrees or less comprising an axis (42-A) projected upon
the face of said central structure (34), and comprises the other axis (42-B)
projected from the origin said fixated joint (42).
7. The checking mechanism (22) for frictionally checking reciprocative
devices (10) of claim 6 wherein
said fixated joint (42) further comprising a strengthening means (43)
selected from the group of tempering, hardening, and crimping.
8. The checking mechanism (22) for frictionally checking reciprocative
devices (10) of claim 6 wherein
the distance between the opposing points (28) within the opposing loci
(26-A) and (26-B) comprises a substantially lesser distance than the
distance between the trigger point (40) to the fulcrum locus (26-A).
9. The checking mechanism (22) for frictionally checking reciprocative
devices (10) of claim 6 wherein
said trigger appendage (38) comprises a substantial curvature surface
disposing said trigger point (40) thereupon, selected from the group
consisting of a substantial arching, ovoid, and convex design (40-A), an
installed pad and clip (40-B), and an adjustable screw means (40-C), whereby
said curvature surface is also projected from said origin axis (42-B) and
projected to the abutting trigger point (40).
10. The checking mechanism (22) for frictionally checking reciprocative
devices (10) of claim 6 wherein
said opposing friction points (28) comprising a modification selected from
the group of tempering, hardening, plating, coating, tipping, and separately
inserting said points (28) into said central structure (34).
11. The checking mechanism (22) for frictionally checking reciprocative
devices (10) of claim 6 wherein
said central structure (34) forming said aperture (26) so shaped to comprise
that certain areas which do not define said opposing friction points (28)
dispose notches (36) to expand said aperture (26), wherein said mechanism
(22) may mount upon a rod (16) comprising diametrically widened supporting
hub (18) or protruding lugs (20) greater than the diameter of said rod (16).
12. The checking mechanism (22) for frictionally checking reciprocative
devices (10) of claim 6 further comprising
said central structure (34) separated upon different bodies, wherein the
distance between said opposing points (28) within said loci (26-A) and
(26-B) comprise variability within said axial plane (30).
13. An improved checking mechanism (22) for checking reciprocative devices
(10) including door closer systems (10) comprising a rod (16) that functions reciprocatively from within a body (12) having a biasing means (11), that,
upon extension of said rod (16) from within said body (12), said device (10)
normally acting to control the reciprocation of said rod (16); said checking
is performed frictionally by means of a checking mechanism (22) for mounting
axially (17) onto said rod (16), comprising an aperture configuration (26)
bounded within a central structure (34) disposing a fulcrum locus (26-A)
opposing a counter locus (26-B), both diametrically composed upon a common
axis of symmetry (32) and each providing at least one substantial opposing
friction point (28) for urging upon the surfaces (16-A) (16-B) of said rod
(16) a substantial direct frictional pressure (29) created within as axial
plane (30); said mechanism (22) further including at least one trigger
appendage (38) angularly attached to said centrol structure (34) to form a
fixated joint (42) projectable by projecting an axis (42-A) upon the face of
said central structure (34), and projecting the other axis (42-B) from the
origin of the fixated joint (42); said trigger appendage (38) disposing a
trigger point (40) to abut against said body (12) upon a trigger plane
(42-C) projected from the origin axis (42-B) and projected to the abutting
trigger point (40); wherein said common axis of symmetry (32) coincides upon
a diametric cross-section of said rod (16) engaged thereto, in combination
the improvements comprising
the opposing friction points (28) comprise a modification means selected
from the group of tempering, hardening, plating, coating, tipping, and a
separate insertion into said central structure (34);
the surface of said trigger appendage (38) disposing said trigger point (40)
upon said trigger plane (42-C) variably, wherein said trigger plane (42-C)
comprising the means to substantially vary as said abutting trigger point
(40) varies upon the surface of said trigger appendage (38);
said fixated joint (42) composed to form an angle of substantially 90
degrees or smaller, and said fixated joint (42) further comprising a
strengthening means (43) selected from the group of tempering, hardening,
and crimping;
whereby said improvements comprise a superior checking mechanism (22) for
frictionally checking said device (10), by providing the maximum direct
frictional pressure (29) created between said opposing points (28) within
said axial plane (30).
14. The improved checking mechanism (22) of claim 13 wherein
said surface of said trigger appendage (38) disposing said trigger point
(40) comprises a substantial curvature surface selected from the group
consisting of a substantial arching, ovoid, and convex design (40-A), an
installed pad and clip (40-B), and an adjustable screw means (40-C) whereby
said curvature surface is also projected from said origin axis (42-B) and
projected to the abutting trigger point (40).
15. The improved checking mechanism (22) of claim 14 wherein
the distance between said trigger point (40) to the fulcrum locus (26-A)
comprise a substantially greater distance than the distance between the
opposing points (28) within the opposing loci (26-A) and (26-B).
16. The improved checking mechanism (22) of claim 13 wherein
said central structure (34) forming said aperture (26) so shaped to comprise
that certain areas which do not define said opposing friction points (28)
dispose notches (36) to expand said aperture (26), wherein said mechanism
(22) may mount upon a rod (16) comprising diametrically widened supporting
hub (18) or protruding lugs (20) greater than the sectional diameter of said
rod (16).
17. The improved checking mechanism (22) of claim 13 wherein
said central structure (34) separated upon different bodies, wherein the
distance between said opposing points (28) within said loci (26-A) and
(26-B) comprises the means for variability within said axial plane (30).
18. The improved checking mechanism (22) of claim 13 wherein
composition for said mechanism (22) selected from the group of natural and
synthetic metals, fibers, ceramics, and plastics.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION
This invention relates to various reciprocative devices comprising a rod
which functions from within a body. The device is utilized for controlling
the movement of an object attached onto the device. A reciprocating door
closer system installed on a common door exemplifies such a device, by
providing a biasing means for varying and controlling the movement of the
door. More particularly, this invention comprises an improved apparatus and
methodology to frictionally check the reciprocative function of the device,
through increased leverage and torsion causing the friction.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which
is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no obligation to
the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent
disclosure, as it appears in the Patent And Trademark Office patent file or
records, but otherwise reserves all copyright whatsoever.
A brief description of a reciprocating device includes a basic door closer
system which comprises a spring operated device controlled with liquid or
gas. The device typically contains a piston assembly including a piston and
sealing o-ring; piston rod varieties which include curved and non-curved
surfaces; internal compression spring and hydraulic biasing operators;
cylindrical-piston tube; sealed and non-sealed end caps; fluid restriction
valves; attachment members; and the checking mechanism to which this
invention pertains. Such door closer systems which comprise checking
mechanisms are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,732,920; 2,920,338; 3,032,806;
3,162,889; 3,566,435; 3,665,549; 4,777,698; and Canadian Pat. No. 623,038.
The checking mechanism is utilized to independently hold the door and door
closer in an open or extended position for an indefinite period of time. The
simplistic mechanism is axially mounted upon the extended rod of the device,
for leveraging certain biasing forces controlled by the device into torsion.
The torsion is urged between opposing points within an axial plane of the
mechanism. The torsion causes substantial direct frictional pressure onto
the surfaces of the piston rod. Thus, the mechanism frictionally checks the
reciprocative function of the device with direct pressure causing the
friction. Among the more elaborate checking mechanisms developed are
illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,194,264 to Soffregen (1980), and U.S. Pat.
No. 4,815,163 to Simmons (1989). Through variously attached apparati
comprising these mechanisms, an elaborate method is created to check the rod
of the device similarly to the basic mechanism disclosed herein.
The prior art checking mechanism is usually metal stamped from a sheet
material such as a predetermined sheet metal gauge. The mechanism comprises
three main components: a) an aperture configuration bounded within a central
structure; b) a trigger appendage; and c) a fixated joint connecting
component a onto component b. The aperture configuration permits the
mechanism to mount upon the rod of the device. The aperture configuration
comprises opposing loci which define the opposing friction points. These
points create the torsional pressure causing the friction within the axial
plane. The central structure provides a boundary for the aperture
configuration. The trigger appendage acts as a lever and provides a trigger
point for abutment to the piston body. The central structure and the trigger
appendage are typically flattened planes composed from the sheet metal
gauge. The fixated joint angularly attaches the central structure onto the
trigger appendage. The components differ slightly on the various prior art
mechanisms, relative to the independent manufacturer's own design. However,
the functionality of the three components are similar on most the prior art
mechanisms.
The hold-open feature is manually activated by first opening the door to a
desired position, thus extending the piston rod of the fixated door closer
system from within the piston body. A counter-force is then normally created
as a result of the system's biasing operators. The checking mechanism is
axially mounted onto the rod through the aperture configuration, first by
moving the mechanism to a desired position on the extended rod. Releasing
the door, the biasing operators act to return the rod towards the normally
retracted position within the body. The biasing force causes the mechanism
to lever at the trigger appendage, once the body contacts the mechanism upon
the trigger point.
The biasing force is redirected at the fixated joint which causes the
checking mechanism to torsionally pivot on the center axis of the aperture
configuration, and pivot on the axis of the piston rod. Thus, the mechanism
pivotally engages onto the rod surface, urged upon the metallic edges of the
opposing loci comprising the opposing friction points. The energy is
substantially equalized and distributed to the points which interact and
deliver the friction within the axial plane of the mechanism. The direct
frictional pressure created by the points is applied onto the curved and
non-curved surfaces of the piston rod, whereby the mechanism frictionally
checks the device. More biasing force controlled by the device results in
more torsional pressure causing the friction onto the surfaces of the rod.
Sectionally dividing the mechanism through the common axis of symmetry and
connecting the opposing points within the axial plane, connected to the
trigger point, a simple angle is illustrated. Therefore, the reader can
better understand the principles of pressure distribution, and the distance
from the trigger point to the opposing loci comprising the opposing friction
points.
Component a) the aperture configuration is not a primary embodiment of this
divisional invention. However, full disclosure can be learned within the
parent application.
Component b) the trigger appendage acts as a lever to leverage the mechanism
for pivotal engagement upon the device. The trigger appendage transposes the
biasing forces controlled by the device into the direct frictional pressure
upon the rod. The trigger appendage provides a trigger point for abutment
onto the piston body. The trigger point varies upon the surface of the
trigger appendage. The trigger point is defined upon a trigger plane. The
trigger plane generally projects from the origin axis for the fixated joint,
projected to the trigger point abutting the body of the device. Because the
surface of the trigger appendage is substantially flat and also projects
from the origin axis, the trigger plane therefore remains fixated as the
trigger point varies upon the surface of the trigger appendage. Thus, in
prior art the trigger point is best defined upon a non-variable trigger
plane. The flat surface of the trigger appendage offers no other adjustable
features for the varying trigger point.
Prior art checking mechanism provide a substantially similar distance
between the three functional points of leverage. Specifically, the distance
from the trigger point to the fulcrum locus is not much greater than the
distance between the opposing friction points within the loci. An average
door closer system comprising a 1.25" (32 mm) piston body and 0.313" (8 mm)
piston rod, comprises a 1.5-to-1 average leverage ratio for the mechanism.
Again, unless the piston rod is modified, the distance between the two
opposing points can not be modified. Resultantly, the sectional distance
between the two opposing points may never become altered or decreased to
partake in any possible leverage advantage for the trigger point.
It may seem obvious that to obtain an increase in leverage ratio, the length
of the trigger appendage should therefore be increased. However, merely
increasing the length of the fixated trigger appendage would require
decreasing the fixated joint, because of the flattened nature comprising the
trigger appendage. The flattened surface of the trigger appendage limits the
trigger point to the non-variable trigger plane, and will not compensate for
an increase in the surface area resulting from any lengthening of the
trigger appendage. Lengthening the trigger appendage would also place more
stress onto the joint, further weakening the mechanism which often does not
comprise hardness or temper modification for the soft sheet steel gauge.
The trigger appendage must create a functional gap between the central
structure and the piston body. The gap must prevent any simultaneous
touching of the central structure against the body, which disrupts the
direct frictional pressure created by the opposing points upon the rod. The
flattened trigger appendage also offers less surface area to increase the
functional gap. As the checking mechanism wears and fatigues, the trigger
point changes and climbs the surface of the flattened trigger appendage. Due
to the non-variable trigger plane, the functional gap is reduced at the same
rate as the climbing trigger point. Thus, there is less surface for the
trigger appendage to provide certain variable extension and adjustment for a
wearing checking mechanism. The flattened trigger appendage also offers less
universalness to adapt a single checking mechanism to various devices.
Component c) the fixated joint comprises an angular connection between the
central structure and the trigger appendage. The joint angularly directs the
biasing forces controlled by the door closer biasing operators, to the
opposing points torquing within the axial plane which cause the direct
frictional pressure. All prior art checking mechanisms disclosed demonstrate
a fixated joint which is greater than 90 degrees at the origin for both
components. Some modern checking mechanisms comprise angular fixated joints
as great as 120 degrees at the origin. The angle at the origin is determined
by projecting an axis (face axis) upon the face of the central structure,
and projecting the other axis (origin axis) from the origin for the trigger
appendage. The origin may be determined as the best angle created between
both components.
Among other factors, the angle must limit the central structure from
simultaneously touching against the piston body along with the trigger
point. Any simultaneous touching of the central structure disrupts the
torsional engagement between the opposing friction points urged upon the
rod. Therefore, the degree of the angle for the fixated joint must
contribute to the functional gap between the central structure and the
piston body. Because the prior art mechanisms are primarily manufactured
from common sheet steel which is relatively soft, the joint is therefore
subject to fatiguing which reduces the functional gap. In order to provide a
mechanism which does not slip, the joint should be both fixated and capable
of withstanding sufficient pressure. U.S. Pat. No. 3,566,435 to Nakamura
(1971) shows a perpendicular angular joint which is not fixated.
Resultantly, this mechanism provides an intentional slipping feature as
described within the contents of the patent.
Another known problem contributing to a substantial reduction in the
functional gap is defined by the natural wearing of the metallic edges which
comprise the opposing friction points. The wearing causes the points to
flatten which may result in a loss of substantial direct frictional
pressure. Thus, the pressure becomes distributed over the two flattened
points instead of being forcefully urged, as upon sharper biting edges
comprising the loci of a branch new checking mechanism. A decrease in the
functional gap may also be caused by the lateral rotation of the mechanism
as previously described. Conclusively, any substantial reduction in the
functional gap may ultimately render the mechanism useless.
Consider the results of a pressure test conducted on a prior art checking
mechanism manufactured from 12 gauge sheet steel, comprising a flattened
central structure; a flattened trigger appendage comprising the trigger
point upon a non-variable plane projecting from the origin axis; and an
fixated joint of approximately 120 degrees. The specimen checking mechanism
was mounted to check a modern door closer comprising a 1.25" diameter piston
body, with a 0.3125" diameter piston rod. With only the pressure created by
the door closer biasing means, after pivotal engagement the average
measurable functional gap between the central structure to end cap of the
piston body was approximately 0.068". At 50 lbs. of direct pressure placed
upon the end of the door closer rod, the fixated joint began fatiguing and
widened, and the functional gap was reduced to 0.035". At 115 lbs. of direct
pressure, the fixated joint had sufficiently fatigued to reduce the
functional gap to 0.000", causing the central structure to simultaneously
contact the piston body along with the trigger point area.
The results of this test concluded that an increase in the pivotal
engagement substantially eliminated the functional gap between the central
structure and the end cap, thus canceling the trigger mechanism and causing
the checking mechanism to completely fail. Thus, it seems obvious that prior
art checking mechanisms would benefit by moving the central structure away
from the piston body to increase the functional gap. This could be achieved
by decreasing the fixated joint to less than 90 degrees at the origin, thus
raising the trigger area upon the non-variable plane of the flattened
surface comprising the trigger appendage. The foregoing would increase the
described functional gap, and increase the life of the checking mechanism.
Tempering, hardening, and further modifying the joint with crimping, could
create a mechanism capable of withstanding a greater pressure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
By decreasing the fixated joint to comprise an angle which is substantially
perpendicular or less, in combination with an improved trigger appendage
design, a substantial increase in leverage is created. The superior trigger
appendage would comprise a substantial and continual curvature surface, thus
disposing a trigger point upon a variable trigger plane and projecting a
disposable surface from the origin axis for the fixated joint. Resultantly,
the leverage is increased; the functional gap is increased; the torsion
created within the axial plane is increased; the direct frictional pressure
is increased; and a superior, universal checking mechanism is created to
extend the life of the complete door closer system.
This invention comprises an improved checking mechanism, utilized for
frictionally checking a reciprocative device including door closer systems.
The objects and advantages of the invention include substantial improvements
to the major components of the simple checking mechanism; b) the trigger
appendage; and c) the fixated joint connecting component a* onto component
b. (*detailed in parent application)
Superior component b) the trigger appendage provides a substantial increase
in surface area, disposing a trigger point upon a substantial curvature
surface. The superior trigger appendage comprises a substantially greater
sectional distance between the trigger point and the fulcrum locus, than the
sectional distance between the opposing points within the loci. An object of
these inventions are to provide a substantial increase in torsion between
the opposing friction points. Another object of these inventions are to
provide a trigger point upon a variable trigger plane. Another object of
these inventions are to create more surface area to comprise the trigger
point. Another object of these inventions are to create more universalness
for the mechanism to various door closer sizes and designs. Another object
of these inventions are to increase the distance from the trigger point to
the fulcrum locus. Another object of these inventions are to project the
disposable surface from the origin axis for the fixated joint. Another
object of these inventions are to project the disposable surface to dissect
the origin axis. Another object of these inventions are to provide an
adjustment means for the trigger point upon the variable trigger plane.
Another object of these inventions are to accommodate for worn or wearing
opposing friction points. Another object of these inventions are to
compensate for an increase in pivotal engagement. Another object of these
inventions are to assist in maintaining a vertical posture for the central
structure. Another object of these inventions are to assist in strengthening
the fixated joint, by possibly directing the biasing force towards the
joint. Another object of these inventions are to increase leverage for the
trigger point. Another object of these inventions are to increase the
functional gap and decrease the motion of the pivotal engagement for the
mechanism.
The inventive mechanism may incorporate a second trigger plate appendage. An
object of this invention is to change the direction of the friction pressure
torsionally applied onto the surfaces of the rod, thus creating a reversible
mechanism. Another object of this invention is to accommodate the various
reciprocating operative devices.
The trigger point may be comprised upon different modified trigger appendage
surface designs including a substantial arching, ovoid, or convex design, an
installed pad, cap, or clip, and an adjustable screw. An object of this
invention is to provide the means for further extending and varying the
trigger point away from the lower-fulcrum locus. Another object of this
invention is to provide a trigger point area upon a substantial curvature
surface. Another object of this invention is to accommodate for worn or
wearing friction pressure points. Another object of this invention is to
maintain a substantial vertical posture for the central structure.
Superior component c) the fixated joint, has been changed to comprise an
angle at the origin which is substantially 90 degrees or less. An object of
this invention is to accommodate a superior trigger appendage design
comprising a substantial curvature surface disposing a trigger point upon a
variable trigger plane projecting from the origin axis. Another object of
this invention is to possibly project said curvature surface above the
origin axis. Another object of this invention is to provide a stronger
checking mechanism that can withstand greater direct frictional pressure.
Another object of this invention is to create more universalness for the
checking mechanism concept, adapting the new trigger appendage design to
other prior art checking mechanism concepts. Another object of this
invention is to compensate for an increase in pivotal engagement due to
certain checking mechanism fatigue. Another object of this invention is to
eliminate slippage due to simultaneous central structure contact upon the
piston body, by decreasing the pivotal engagement and increasing the
functional gap.
Furthermore, material comprising the joint may be tempered, hardened, and
crimped. An object of this invention is to provide superior durability for
the mechanism, and more particularly, to substantially eliminate any
flexation of the fixated joint.
These and further objects of the invention will be apparent from the
following description of the preferred embodiments thereof.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a prospective view of a superior checking mechanism or which
illustrates an aperture configuration designed with notches and shown with
modified opposing friction points including a point encircled for
enlargement, and also showing a trigger appendage comprising a substantial
curvature surface consisting of an ovoid, or convex design.
FIG. 2 is a side view of a reciprocative device comprising a door closer
system, illustrating the superior checking mechanism of FIG. 1, foremost
shown checking the extended piston rod. The mechanism is also shown
superimposed in an idle position on the rod.
FIG. 3 is a side view of a conceptual mechanism comprising a central
structure upon two separate bodies, also showing two trigger appendages with
various trigger point options, and shown upon a partial piston rod
comprising non-curved surfaces. A method for adjusting the mechanism is also
illustrated.
FIG. 4 is a front view of the mechanism shown in FIG. 3 which illustrates
the aperture configuration comprising a minimum of three opposing frictional
points, showing the trigger point upon an adjustable screw, and illustrated
upon a sectional view of the piston rod comprising non-curved surfaces.
FIG. 5 is a prospective view of a checking mechanism comprising a prior art
central structure fixated to a superior convexity design trigger plate
appendage which comprises a substantial curvature surface disposing a
variable trigger area upon a variable plane.
FIG. 6 is a side view of the checking mechanism shown in FIG. 6 divided upon
the common axis of symmetry, illustrating the fixated joint which is
substantially 90 degrees or less, illustrating the trigger appendage
comprising the simple arching design.
FIG. 7 is a reference list.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 are taught conceptually together wherein the checking
mechanism 22 is stamp manufactured from a predetermined sheet metal gauge
37, although the mechanism 22 could be made from synthetic material with
separately inserted metallic loci 26-A and 26-B. The mechanism 22 comprises
a aperture configuration 26 bounded within a central structure 34 forming a
fulcrum locus 26-A opposing a counter locus 26-B, composed upon a common
axis of symmetry 32. The central structure 34 is attached to the trigger
appendage 38 by the fixated joint 42.
FIG. 2 illustrates the superior checking mechanism 22 shown in FIG. 1,
mounted upon the reciprocative device 10. The mechanism is mounted on the
rod 16 axially 17, by means of the center aperture 26 bound within the
central structure 34. The superimposed mechanism 22 is shown in an idle
position 24-A, residing between the support hub 18 and the protruding lug
20. The biasing means 11 extends the rod 16 away from the body 12 with
outward force 11-A. For engagement, the superimposed idle mechanism 22 is
moved past the protruding lugs 20 on the extended rod 16, into the position
of the foremost shown mechanism 22. Inward biasing force 11-B controlled by
the device 10 returns the rod 16 towards the body 12. The functional gap 46
shows the distance between the mechanism 22 and the cap 14 of the body 12.
The trigger appendage 38 transposes the biasing forces 11 controlled by the
device 10 into the direct frictional pressure 29 upon the rod 16. The
trigger appendage 38 acts as a lever and causes the foremost mechanism 22 to
pivotally engage 24 into a checking position 24-B. The trigger appendage 38
comprises a substantial curvature surface including a substantial arching,
ovoid, or convex design 40-A. The trigger appendage 38 disposing the trigger
point 40, contacts the body 12 and end cap 14. The trigger point 40
comprises the means to substantially vary upon the surface of the trigger
appendage 38. The trigger point 40 is defined upon a trigger plane 42-C. The
trigger plane 42-C generally projects from the origin axis 42-B for the
fixated joint 42, and projected to the trigger point 42 abutting the body 12
of the device 10. As the trigger point 40 varies upon the surface of the
trigger appendage 38, the trigger plane 42-C also varies. Thus, the trigger
point 40 is defined upon a superior variable trigger plane 42-C.
Because of the physics of the substantial curvature surface, more surface
area becomes available to accommodate the trigger point 40. The increase in
surface area substantially increases the functional gap 46. Thus, the
mechanism 22 maintains a better vertical posture, and the pivotal engagement
24 is reduced. The mechanism 22 becomes more universal and adjustable for
various types of devices 10, including various diameters of piston bodies
12, end caps 14, and rods 16. The curvature surface can also compensate for
fatiguing of the fixated joint 42 and wearing of the opposing friction
points 28. It shall be stated that the inventive concept of the points 28
comprising direct frictional pressure 29 away from the common axis of
symmetry 32, may be fully incorporated with out the need to utilize a
curvature surface the trigger appendage 38. However, the nature of the
curvature surface promotes adjustability for the mechanism 22.
The fixated joint 42 redirects the biasing means 11 which causes the
mechanism 22 to pivot on the center axis 31 of the aperture configuration
26, and the axis 17 of rod 16. The preferred fixated joint 42 between the
central structure 34 and the trigger appendage 38 comprises an angle of 90
degrees or less at the origin. The narrowness of the joint 42 creates a
stronger checking mechanism 22 which substantially eliminates flexation at
the joint 42, by possibly directing pressure towards the joint 42. The joint
42 also accommodates the trigger appendage 38 comprising the substantial
arching, ovoid, or convex design 40-A. The joint 42 may comprise a
strengthening means 43 such as tempering, hardening, and crimping.
FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 show a conceptual mechanism 22 comprising plural central
structures 34 and trigger appendages 38. Among other issues, this conception
is useful to provide adjustment for worn friction pressure points 28, and to
accommodate for variously sized and types of reciprocative devices 10
including varied piston rod 16 and piston bodies 12. The aperture shows the
three friction pressure points positioning at least one point 28 on the
fulcrum locus 26-A and two points 28 at the counter locus 26-B. Note that
the direct frictional pressure 29 is not linearly aligned upon the common
axis of symmetry 32. The loci 26-A and 26-B comprise substantially larger
points 28. Plural central structures 34, separate yet attached to each
other, may provide variable opposing points 28 for the loci 26-A and 26-B
within the axial plane 30. Adjustment is made perhaps with the blade of a
screwdriver, by slightly prying or separating 44 the two central structures
34. Other methods of separating the loci 26-A and 26-B to comprise
variability within the axial plane 30 may be utilized without departing from
the invention disclosed therein.
Reversibility of the mechanism 22 may result from plural trigger appendages
38, as both the outward force 11-A and inward force 11-B may be checked. The
trigger appendages 38 demonstrate a trigger point 40 both upon an adjustable
screw 40-B, and a pad or clip 40-C. The mechanism 22 is conceptually
illustrated upon piston rod 16 comprising non-curved surfaces 16-B. The
mechanism 22 may be rotated about the rod 16 so that the points 28 coincide
with the edges of the non-curved surfaces 16-B. Furthermore, the mechanism
22 can be made from an organic or synthetic material with the points 28
separately inserted. Insertion of the points 28 may require that the central
structure 34 be composed of two mating parts held together with a fastening
means. It shall be stated that the preferred offsetting planes 37-B are
created within the plural and thicker central structures 34.
FIG. 5 and FIG. 6 are taught conceptually together wherein FIG. 5
illustrates the inventive concept in combination upon a hold-open bracket 22
comprising a prior art circular aperture configuration 26 with two friction
pressure points 28 comprising the opposing torsional pressure 29 (not shown)
within the axial plane 30. The central structure 34 is fixated to the
superior trigger plate appendage 38 by the fixated angular joint 42 of
approximately 90 degrees or less at the origin. The fixated angular joint 42
comprises a strengthening means 43 such as tempering, hardening, and
crimping. The trigger plate appendage 38 comprises the point 40 upon a
substantial curvature surface, consisting of a more simplified arching
design for transposing a torsional pressure 29 between the opposing points
28 within the axial plane 30.
If the reader chooses to argue that certain prior art disclosed herein may
possibly comprise a variable trigger area 40 disposed upon a variable plane
42-C, due to any secondary angle comprising the angular fixated joint 42,
such a disposable surface would certainly not comprise a substantially
curvature surface, nor comprise a variable trigger point 40 disposed upon a
substantially variable trigger plane 42-C, due to the substantially
flattened nature of all the prior art trigger appendages 38 disclosed
herein.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,920,338 to Falk (1960) shows a trigger
appendage (61) which appears to comprises a gradual radius, fixated
angularly to the central structure at a substantial 90 degree angle.
However, as described in the patent the trigger appendage (61) is "bent
downwardly" from the 90 degree fixated angle, as the word "bent" is best
defined as "being changed out of a straight or even condition such as with
twigs". The patent does not demonstrate nor define the trigger appendage
(61) as comprising a variable trigger area upon a substantially variable
plane, nor as comprising a substantially curvature surface projecting from
the origin axis.
The particular embodiments of the present invention which have been
illustrated and discussed herein are for illustrative purposes only and are
not considered as a limitation upon the scope of the appended claims. In
these claims set forth, it is my intent to claim the entire invention
disclosed herein, except as I am limited by the prior art.
Accordingly, the scope of the invention should not be determined only by the
embodiments illustrated, but also by the appended claims and their legal
equivalents. From the above description of the invention submitted, various
changes and modifications and improvement may occur to the apparatus. All
such claims are intended to be included therein.
* * * * *
|